The Midnight Mission
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 951691293
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Phone
- 2136249258
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Homeless Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $15,146,021
- Expenses
- $17,651,453
- Assets
- $53,644,267
- Liabilities
- $5,894,455
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID L PRENTICE (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- DAVID L PRENTICE (PRESIDENT & CEO): $266,116 total reported compensation
- DONALD HOLT (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $167,313 total reported compensation
- GEORGIA E BERKOVICH HAWLEY (CHIEF COMMUNICATIONS OFFICER): $163,558 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The midnight mission seeks to offer a bridge to self sufficiency for people experiencing homelessness through interim shelter, advocacy, education, training and job placement, make available the necessities of life, offer the 12-step approach to recovery and provide for the homeless as an independent social service agency.
What it reported doing in 2024
Family living: the midnight mission's homelight family living program provides a path for families experiencing homelessness and in crisis to reunify and rebuild their lives with the tools needed to be self-sufficient and stably housed. In the past 12 months, homelight provided individually tailored services and transitional housing to 20 families comprised of 27 adults and 36 children. Homelight services focus on restoring the whole family in a safe, stable and service rich environment. Services include assessments, case management, individual and family therapy, employment development, financial literacy and debt reduction, household budgeting, financial planning, life skills and on-site groups designed to increase family stability and empowerment. The program achieves a high rate of success for more than 80% of the families served successfully transitioning to appropriate housing for their unique needs. In addition to the services noted above, adults receive services designed to enhance their skills and earning potential, as well as access to vocational training. Children receive mental health services as needed, connections with schools, resources, and tutoring to maintain grade level, have daily access to the computer lab, and daily physical activities through the on-site playground. Families receiving these intensive services are helped to thrive and leave with tools needed to be self-sufficient. Alumni families remain connected to homelight and inspire families that are currently at homelight by speaking at ceremonies, mentoring, and volunteerism . Additionally, the homelight program assists families separated by the county dcfs system to reunifying with their children in safe, secure environments, one of the only programs able to provide this essential assistance in los angeles county.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 72
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.1%; rating input score 93
- Program expense ratio: 77.6%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.2 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 75.7%; rating input score 76; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -16.5%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.04; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.4%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.1% of revenue deployed · 77.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 14 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $13.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $266K · 19 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $258K reported
- Consistency: 29 of 30 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 29/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 40/100.