The Meadow Run - Mountain Lake Park Historical Society
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 261648379
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Bear Creek, PA, USA
- Phone
- 5708218992
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Support N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $20
- Assets
- $2,091
- Liabilities
- $593
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Juanita Krieger (President)
- Frank Haduck (Vice-President)
People named in this filing
- Juanita Krieger (President)
- Frank Haduck (Vice-President)
- Edward J Allen (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To collect and preserve the history of meadow run and mountain lakes and the ice and timber industries associated with them.
What it reported doing in 2024
To collect and preserve the history of meadow run and mountain lakes and the ice and timber industries associated with them; to educate the public on the contribution of meadow run and mountain lakes to the industrial growth of its geographic area and the nation; to maintain existing structures and interpret their role in the industrial life of the community and the area; to maintain exhibits and serve as a repository of documents and artifacts on the industrial operations conducted in the community to conduct public programs on the history and industrial contributions of the area.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 104.55; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -25.4% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -17.4% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -8.5% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.