The Mckenzie Noelle Wilson Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
273388916
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Ponte Vedra Beach, FL, USA
Phone
9042263891
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and Fund Distribution

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$137,903
Expenses
$224,565
Assets
$674,103
Liabilities
$25

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BLAKE WILSON (CHAIRMAN/CEO)
  • STEPHANIE WILSON (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • BLAKE WILSON (CHAIRMAN/CEO)
  • STEPHANIE WILSON (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
  • BLAKE WILSON JR (CFO/TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mckenzie noelle wilson foundation was established in memory of mckenzie wilson who passed away in 2010. The foundation is dedicated to investing in our future by helping our young people find their purpose in an increasingly complex and challenging world. The foundation supports a variety of efforts to help young people identify and develop their talents, their character, and their spirituality in order to become productive and fulfilled adults.

What it reported doing in 2025

The mckenzie noelle wilson foundation is dedicated to investing in our future by helping young people find their purpose in an increasingly complex and challenging world. Through the foundation's continued partnership with the boys and girls clubs of northeast Florida, the foundation supports after school programs, with the shared mission to help provide great futures for at-risk youth through academic tutoring, mentoring, job readiness and skill building programs, at both mckenzie's beaches boys and girls club, as well as mckenzie's camp deep pond, a 63-acre adventure property which allows for outdoor activities that promote confidence, character development, and teamwork in the lives of thousands of underserved young people during the summer and throughout the school year. Additionally, the foundation continues to support programs and activities that support our youth across the globe, including our partnership with okoa refuge, an orphanage in uganda africa, and other initiatives committed to helping young people realize their full potential.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 62% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 87
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 96.4%; rating input score 96
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 98.7%; rating input score 99; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -62.8%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4.5% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -9.1% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 96.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $216K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 18 of 19 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 54/100.