The McConnell Group, Inc.
Legal name: The Mcconnell Group Inc Welfare Trust Plan
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 260733725
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2018
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2011, Form 990-EZ 2018
- Location
- Rockville, MD, USA
- Phone
- 301.309.8310
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Insurance Providers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $77,299
- Expenses
- $23,450
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
People named in this filing
- IRVING MCCONNELL (Trustee)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The trust provides fringe benefits to employees covered by the service contract act. Employee benefits, including health, dental, vision, life and short term disability insurance and paid time off are required to meet minimum prevailing wage rates as required under the act.
The McConnell Group, Inc. is a health sciences company providing professional and technical services and products to enhance the success of companies in a rapidly changing marketplace. It supports biomedical research, life sciences, medical research and technology, and international affairs. The organization is a Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business and holds ISO 9001:2015 certification for its Quality Management System.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 69.7%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -11% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -15.3% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4.5% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2012 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.