The Maryland Jewish Experience
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 204339852
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Silver Spring, MD, USA
- Phone
- 3014038823
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Judaism
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $748,702
- Expenses
- $529,973
- Assets
- $1,111,170
- Liabilities
- $223,983
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ARI KORETSKY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND PRES)
- SHAWN GOLDSTEIN (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ARI KORETSKY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND PRES): $188,170 total reported compensation
- SHAWN GOLDSTEIN (VICE PRESIDENT): $122,450 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Array of student programming including religious, educational, social, and leadership opportunities at the univ of md college park campus.
What it reported doing in 2025
Meor MD offers a fully array of religious, social, leadership, and Jewish educational programs at the Univ of MD College Park Campus. Programs include Shabbat on and off campus, Maimonides Leadership Program, Israel Programs, Women s Programming, Alumni Programming, and JInternship Programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 90% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 35
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 65.4%; rating input score 65
- Program expense ratio: 92.1%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: $30.9 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 97.9%; rating input score 98; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 33.3%; rating input score 33; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 29.2%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.1; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 58.6%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 22.5% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 65.4% of revenue deployed · 92.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 3 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $488K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $188K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2018 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 33/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.