The Malachi Academy Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 923149208
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Port Saint Lucie, FL, USA
- Phone
- 9542433246
- Rating
- 94
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Specialized Education Institutions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $147,096
- Expenses
- $144,765
- Assets
- $39,673
- Liabilities
- $65,182
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Lendilyn Maranan (President)
- Veronica Rojas (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Lendilyn Maranan (President)
- Veronica Rojas (Vice President)
- Hannah Vergara (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Individualized educational support to students with special needs
What it reported doing in 2024
The academy utilizes curriculums such as N2Y, Unique, Montessori Math and the Science of Reading,. In 2024-25 academic year, 30 students and their families benefited from the program, evidenced by the exponential academy growth.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 95
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 95.5%; rating input score 96
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.6%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.64; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 25.8%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 109.7% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 168.7% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 41.7% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 94% of revenue deployed · 95.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $138K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.