The Machinery Haulers Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 264682692
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Buckingham, IA, USA
- Phone
- 3192147323
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Business and Industry
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $137,415
- Expenses
- $123,331
- Assets
- $66,465
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CLAYTON FISK (CEO)
People named in this filing
- LANCE VOTROUBEK (Director)
- DAVE GALLANO (Director)
- JON COCA (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The association's gross receipts consist of charges against members in providing advocacy, information, data, and support to ensure safe transportation and a successful trucking industry serving the needs of business and communities, in intrastate, interstate, and foreign commerce, and to transact any and all lawful business, for which a non-profit business may be incorporated. All of the expenditures of the association are made out of the receipts and other income for the purpose for which the association was organized.
What it reported doing in 2025
The association is organized for several purposes, among them to enable cooperative and economy of members with respect to enable prompt dissemination of decisions, bulletins, and other proper information touching the business welfare of the membership and the industry to which they are engaged. The income relates to information and services performed by the association for these express purposes. The association does not intend to earn a profit from the above activities, and when the costs associated with these activities are considered, program service activities would show a loss.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.2%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.54; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.