The Long Island Home Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.

13 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

See schedule o

The long island home foundation provided tuition assistance to a student persuing a master's in healthcare administration.

Revenue model: Investment-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: Limited
Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Related-party transparency: Limited

Independent voting board: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Operating margin: 77.9%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 76.35; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 249.5%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Program expense growth: Limited
Revenue growth: 34.1% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
Governance: 11 of 12 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
Leadership: top reported pay $840K · 13 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
Filing history: 2 filing years from 2010 to 2011
Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.