The Local Community Housing Corporation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
204000503
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2010
Location
Tarpon Springs, FL, USA
Phone
7279374411
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$682,930
Expenses
$767,303
Assets
$1,218,943
Liabilities
$825

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jacqueline Malone (President)
  • Arlene Sullivan (Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Robbin S Redd (Secretary/Treas): $187,848 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Local Community Housing Corporation (LCHC) is a nonprofit agency and its mission is to manage and provide affordable housing and facilitate services that promotes stability for children, individuals and families and upward mobility for increased quality of life.

What it reported doing in 2024

Home Share PinellasThe Home Share Pinellas program was founded by LCHC in 2006. The program addresses the lack of affordable housing in Pinellas County for 20 years next 2026. The model is simple and extremely impactful if not a life saver. Staff with an extensive professional background facilitate new client (Homeowner Providers or Renters) eligibility process that includes background check of both potential Homeowner, comprehensive application and interviewing process prior to becoming approved as a Home Providers. Providers are homeowners who have a home yet struggle to keep up with ownership expenses such as mortgage, property taxes, homeowners insurance, and maintenance costs. Most of Home Shares current homeowners are from the Baby Boomer generation that want to age in place and maintain the home they have lived in for decades. They need a trustworthy tenant that can reliably pay below the market rate monthly rent. Traditionally Home Share has been able to help Renters negotiate rent rates that are 30% of the total current market rent rate for a one-bedroom apartment in Pinellas County. This steady income allows homeowners to avoid foreclosure, invest in home improvements and maintenance such as new AC, roofing, hot water heaters, etc. and have enough money to live well. Home Share has been able to directly empower long-term quality and stable housing such as 3-10 years matched, which HUD calls length of stay. Home Share Renters are individuals in need of housing that will allow them to pay an affordable rent which no longer exists in the private market across our Nation. Everyone deserves the right and dignity to live in a comfortable and secured dwelling and have long-term housing security and peace of mind versus the year-by-year anxiety of landlord rent hikes. Renters can be adult students, adults, small families (one adult one child or a couple) with a low-moderate income or people on fixed incomes. We often hear from applicants that they cant secure housing assistance vouchers through HUD programs due to the full and closed enrollment waitlists. Our sister agency Tarpon Springs Housing Authority certainly understands this local and national backlog of a population count that significantly exceeds the number of housing options available. This is a national crisis. Renters are working adults who can pay rent close to but not at the market and find it impossible to pay costly applications fees and one years advance rent deposits, creating a barrier to obtaining quality housing if a unit becomes available. A critically important phase of matching a Homeowner Provider and a Renter is talking with them privately and later together about their needs, interests and preferences. The match assessment process is both a skill and a nontangible art. The current Program Coordinator has more than 11 years working for Home Share Pinellas in addition to directly defining the protocol and facilitating the operational objectives to empower quality long term housing security for both the Homeowner and the Renter. Home Share professional staff promote living arrangements that are a good fit and mutually beneficial. Most Home Providers and Renters have stated in customer satisfaction surveys that having a long-term Renter / Home Provider arrangement enabled them to achieve greater quality of life goals because sharing home with another adult, they experienced lower levels of depression, anxiety and stress and strengthened their financial stability. Plus, the companionship is often a welcome bonus knowing that someone cares about your general safety coming and going from your home day by day. Home Share staff enjoy learning about the Home Provider and Renter becoming close friends and sharing their lives together like extended family, participating in hobbies to enjoying the festivities of the Holiday seasons. For the past 6 years, the average length of stay has been more than 27 months (2 years, 3 months. Most Home Providers are current

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 89% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 67
  • Accountability: 87
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 98.4%; rating input score 98
  • Program expense ratio: 87.6%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -12.4%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.59; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.8%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 98.4% of revenue deployed · 87.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $672K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $188K · 7 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay and related organizations
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 59/100.