The Lions Club of Pierson Florida
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 596170073
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Pierson, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3867494356
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Service Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $62,410
- Expenses
- $43,184
- Assets
- $355,154
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PHILLIP HUGHES (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- PHILLIP HUGHES (PRESIDENT)
- DEANN GEMINHARDTT (1ST VICE PRE)
- JACKIE NORTH (2ND VICE PRE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Pierson lions club's mission is to take an active interest in the civic, cultural, social and moral welfare of the community; to unite its members in the bonds of friendship, good fellowship and mutual understanding; to encourage service minded people to serve their community without personal financial reward; and to encourage efficiency and promote high ethical standards in commerce, industry, professions, public works and private endeavors. The club offers educational programs, networking events, humanitarian relief efforts for the community and other community related programs.
What it reported doing in 2025
Old timer's day picnic. The club hosts an annual gathering for current and former residents of the area to socialize and share the agricultural history of the area. Club members prepare and serve the meal and provide entertainment. The picnic is a popular event that is well attended by current residents as well as former residents who travel from other states to attend.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 81% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 80% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 45
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 44.9%; rating input score 45
- Program expense ratio: 46.4%; rating input score 46
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 30.8%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.22; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 44.9% of revenue deployed · 46.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $20K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 46/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.