The Lion Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
200081148
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Camp Hill, PA, USA
Phone
7177755170
Rating
90
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Foundations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,246,102
Expenses
$1,139,712
Assets
$14,374,818
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

25 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TOM BECKLEY (PRESIDENT)
  • KELLY FALCK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • KELLY FALCK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $49,811 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To improve the quality of the education for the camp hill school district students; and to support and enhance programs for the benefit of the camp hill school district students.

What it reported doing in 2024

Costs associated with the annual operation and maintenance of the grace milliman pollock performing arts center for the camp hill school district. In 2006, longtime camp hill resident, mrs. Grace milliman pollock, donated $15 million to the camp hill school district through the lion foundation for the creation of and an endowment to sustain the the grace milliman pollock performing arts center attached to the eisenhower elementary school campus. The pollock endowment is managed by the lion foundation, has grown to over $10 million and funds the annual cost involved in maintenance and operation of the pollock center. Since being built, the grace milliman pollock performing arts center has exceeded all expectations as a valued resource to the school district and camp hill community. The center is a unique teaching, learning and production facility that includes a 500-seat theatre, a dance studio, green room, music library, outdoor performance area, and instructional rooms for vocal and instrumental music as well as visual and graphic arts. During the school day, students in grades 3-5 use the facility. When school is not in session, students in grades 6-12 and the community use it to enhance their theatre, dance, music and art experiences and skills, as they view, practice, perform, present and exhibit within the center. Programming for the pollock center, includes offerings which reach beyond the school district to include the music lessons, art and drama programs and summer camps, choral and jazz concerts, and other student choral and jazz festival events held at the center. It also offers rentals for educational, civic, recreational and cultural events for the community

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 94% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 89
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 86.9%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: $11.09 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 96%; rating input score 96; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 49.3%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 12.61; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.4%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 86.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 24 of 25 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $991K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $50K · 25 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 41/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.