The Lilium Initiative
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 881774629
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Guerneville, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7072392915
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,502
- Expenses
- $2,989
- Assets
- $42,630
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DENISE CUSACK (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DENISE CUSACK (PRESIDENT)
- AMANDA FISK (TREASURER)
- ROBYN KLEIN (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To continue to create a platform to educate and connect traditional chinese medicine herbalists and ecologically based us farmers to ensure access to strong, sustainable, locally grown asian medicinal herbs and to support the conservation of these venerated asian botanicals. Li has three primary programs that help educate and support us farmers and practitioners in the cultivation of regenerative, sustainable, high-quality, efficacious asian herbs. The growers support group is a communication platform for the exchange of information where farmers can share experiences and help educate each other. Lis sales support program assists farmers in how to prepare chinese medicinal herbs for market, assuring quality by evaluating samples and connecting them with opportunities for sale of their finished product. Free educational presentations are offered throughout the year for all members and open to other interested parties on a sliding scale fee basis.
What it reported doing in 2025
Shipping costs for books seed packets and cards and for shipping materials: envelopes mailing seed packets.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 65
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.6%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 14.26; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -18.3% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23.4% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $285 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 4 of 5 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- Review — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization could not be resolved against the register, so the check is unfinished.