The Library Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 830234279
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Gillette, WY, USA
- Phone
- 3076870009
- Rating
- 55
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $376,199
- Expenses
- $143,053
- Assets
- $3,241,169
- Liabilities
- $903,798
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DARA CORKERY (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- TERRI LESLEY (LIBRARY DIRE): $86,586 total reported compensation
- JOHN JACKSON (LIBRARY DIRE): $27,003 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Support of the library programs at campbell county public library.
What it reported doing in 2023
The library foundation is the fiscal sponsor of the dolly parton program. They agreed to be the fiscal sponsor because the project supports early literacy, which is also the purpose of the library. Fundraising is handled by two community members who took on this community project. These two individuals are volunteers who raise funds for books and sign up members of the community to receive free children's books for kids 0 to age 5. The dolly parton foundation provides the books via mail to kids at a greatly discounted price (the dolly parton foundation covers most of the cost of books/postage). The library foundation deposits fundraising proceeds and pays for the books out of the the library foundation's dolly parton fib bank account.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 88% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 15
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 9.7%; rating input score 10
- Program expense ratio: 25.4%; rating input score 25
- Fundraising efficiency: $1.34 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 62%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 22.66; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 9.7% of revenue deployed · 25.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $36K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $87K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2010 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 10/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 25/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.