The Lenfest Institute for Journalism Special Asset Fund of Tpf

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
043731829
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Phone
2155636417
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Fund Raising and Fund Distribution

Reported finances

Revenue
$26,054,320
Expenses
$22,756,190
Assets
$133,928,628
Liabilities
$5,672,646

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

40 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JAMES FRIEDLICH (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER - LLC)
  • PEDRO A RAMOS (SECRETARY, PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • JAMES FRIEDLICH (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER - LLC): $641,574 total reported compensation
  • PEDRO A RAMOS (SECRETARY, PRESIDENT & CEO): $528,416 total reported compensation
  • ANNIE MADONIA (CHIEF ADVANCEMENT OFFICER - LLC): $380,822 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the lenfest institute for journalism special asset fund of the philadelphia foundation (the institute) is to receive, manage, and distribute assets in support of the philadelphia foundation (tpf) by enabling quality local journalism that serves its communities.

What it reported doing in 2024

The lenfest institute for journalism, llc (llc): the llc is a disregarded entity of the institute that supports both the digital transformation of heritage news organizations and the entrepreneurial efforts of young, innovative companies. The institute believes that quality civic journalism requires new business models, powerful innovations and growing, diverse audiences to achieve sustainability in the digital age. It funds programs that produce high-impact journalism, innovative news technology, and that help local news organizations reach new audiences and develop sustainable digital business models.(continued on schedule o.)to accomplish the organization's exempt purpose, and create clarity of focus underneath the overarching program objectives, three core categories have been developed: national, philadelphia, and the inquirer. The following specific programmatic activities and accomplishments all serve the overarching programmatic objectives to support programs that produce high-impact journalism, innovate news technology, and lead to highly engaged, diverse and growing audiences.the philadelphia inquirer: the lenfest institute is the nonprofit, non-controlling owner of the philadelphia inquirer, which is now the largest newspaper in america operated as a public-benefit corporation. The institute's ownership of the inquirer, which covers one of the largest, most diverse metro regions in the country, is the cornerstone of its enthusiastic investment in local news.the philadelphia news ecosystem: in the philadelphia area, the institute facilitates a collaborative news and information ecosystem that builds on valuable history while also fostering entrepreneurial vision and innovation. Diversity and representation are critical components of positive business outcomes. The institute is working to define different pathways to sustainability for publishers while also ensuring a diversity of representative voices and leadership in both legacy and independent media reflective of the communities they are serving. Spotlight pa: spotlight pa, the harrisburg newsroom launched by the lenfest institute and the philadelphia inquirer, creates high-quality nonpartisan investigative and accountability reporting for the benefit of all pennsylvanians. It provides its reporting free-of-charge to more than 80 other newspapers, public radio stations, and websites throughout the commonwealth. As the steward of both the inquirer and spotlight pa, the institute is blazing a unique path by serving legacy publishers and digital start-ups as they aim to fill gaps and serve new and underrepresented audiences. National solutions for local news: nationally, the institute leverages its institutional expertise and resources to facilitate capacity building for local news publishers through training programs and grantmaking to support the implementation of business model best practices. Other program activities: the institute supports both the digital transformation of heritage news organizations and the entrepreneurial efforts of young, innovative companies. Other program activities include convening, advisory work, learnings seminars, research and other outreach in support of local journalism.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 75% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 72
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.5%; rating input score 82
  • Program expense ratio: 88%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: $15.76 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.9%; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12.7%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.89; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.3%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.9% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.5% of revenue deployed · 88% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 28 of 30 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $20M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $642K · 40 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.5M reported
  • Consistency: 36 of 37 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 107 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 102 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 51/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.