The Legacy Ministry Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
463491785
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Guthrie, OK, USA
Phone
4055412220
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Religion Related N.E.C.
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$11,044
Expenses
$17,862
Assets
$13,146

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

People named in this filing

  • KATINA LOUDERBACK (Executive Dir.)
  • SCOTTY LOUDERBACK (Director)
  • BRIAN CRISMAN (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Legacy Ministry began in August 2013. The Legacy Ministry seeks to help couples build their marriages on the firm foundation of Jesus Christ; to live their lives sacrificially to God and each other, so that they can disciple their children, teaching them to love God and others, to grow in wisdom, stature and in favor with God and others, and to serve Him faithfully, for the glory of God. The ministry will do this by coaching parents one on one, in a small group setting, and/or through a church or organization. The intention of the ministry is to help couples build a marriage based on Biblical principles, and then help them to leave The Legacy of Jesus Christ with their children. Eventually, the ministry hopes to provide families with curriculum that will help them as they pursue Christ and leaving His legacy. The Legacy Ministry will be funded mainly by charitable contributions, fees to churches for speaking engagements, and fees for curriculum.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 23
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -61.7%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.74; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.7% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.6% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.