The Lebron James Family Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 020716277
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Akron, OH, USA
- Phone
- 2167712323
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public, Society Benefit N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,525,763
- Expenses
- $11,063,892
- Assets
- $25,521,228
- Liabilities
- $4,561,414
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GLORIA JAMES (PRESIDENT)
- MAVERICK CARTER (VICE PRESIDENT/TREASURER)
- LYNN MERRITT (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MICHELE CAMPBELL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- VICTORIA MCGEE (DIRECTOR OF FAMILY RESOURC): $217,947 total reported compensation
- TONI MONTGOMERY (DIRECTOR OF IPROMISE PROGR): $154,174 total reported compensation
- WILLIE MCGEE (DIRECTOR): $138,743 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
What began as a mission to raise graduation rates in lebron's hometown of akron, Ohio, the lebron james family foundation's work has evolved into a movement that is redefining what family and community looks like. See schedule o for further information.
What it reported doing in 2024
Ljff hospitality: within the walls of house three thirty, change is being made through the community education program that provides i promise family members the opportunity to cultivate new skills and engage in job training to gain meaningful employment and work experience. With specially devised industry curriculum delivered by coaches and other industry experts, the first cohort of students are learning in a we are family environment that meets them where they are, making their long-held academic and career goals accessible. It is an educational movement that breaks down barriers and recognizes that a one-size-fits-all approach may not work for all families. The community education program began with eight weeks of training for team members committed to we are family training camp with specialty curriculum delivered alongside industry experts. A particular focus is also placed on life skills including leadership, communication and accountability, skills that are transferrable to all facets of life. Upon completing all sectors of training camp, our first official cohort of team members continue learning in real-world settings, providing various services available within house three thirty. As they practice and master skills across different sectors, they are beginning to develop their passion and build confidence. This innovative job training experience allows them to continue providing for their families while they pursue higher education and cultivate valuable job experience and training. Day-to-day, the community education program is administered by five coaches that oversee team members schedules, administer wraparound supports, and continue to develop appropriate curriculum.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 75% for direct work, and 25% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 81.5%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -47%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.31; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.9%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.1% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15.9% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 25.3% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 81.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $218K · 10 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $864K reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.