The Langford Family Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 597146939
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Orlando, FL, USA
- Phone
- 4076251402
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Private Grantmaking Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $110,132
- Expenses
- $65,488
- Assets
- $1,207,982
- Liabilities
- $34,065
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- TAMARA LANGFORD BEREZA (DIRECTOR): $5,113 total reported compensation
- JESSICA LANGFORD FRY (DIRECTOR): $5,113 total reported compensation
- CLINTON A LOUDERMILK (DIRECTOR): $5,113 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Support and benefit publicly supported organizations.
What it reported doing in 2024
Aces matter - to provide high quality mental, physical, and spiritual wellness education to first-generation college students, first-generation trauma chain breakers, and early career individuals.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 69% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 45
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 98.5%; rating input score 99
- Program expense ratio: 75.4%; rating input score 75
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 57.1%; rating input score 57; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Limited
- Other executive compensation review process: Limited
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 40.5%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 18.45; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 23.4%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 98.5% of revenue deployed · 75.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 7 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $49K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $5K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.