The Land Trust for Tennessee

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
621770549
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Official website data refreshed
Jul 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Nashville, TN, US
Phone
615-244-5263
Rating
65
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Land Resources Conservation

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,042,372
Expenses
$2,326,628
Assets
$26,709,972
Liabilities
$178,215

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ELIZABETH MCLAURIN (PRESIDENT/CEO)
  • EMILY PARISH (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • ELIZABETH MCLAURIN (PRESIDENT/CEO): $186,318 total reported compensation
  • EMILY PARISH (VICE PRESIDENT): $145,750 total reported compensation
  • PAUL MALONE (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE): $109,664 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To protect the unique character of Tennessee's natural and historic landscapes and sites for future generations.

What it reported doing in 2024

Conservation success: during fiscal year 2025, the organization completed 9 new projects, protecting 938 additional acres of land in Tennessee. Six of these properties were protected with conservation easements, the organization's primary tool for conserving land, and two were amendments to add 22.91 and 86 acres of land to existing conservation easements. One was a fee-simple acquisition to expand an existing property the organization owns. Three of the nine projects are located in one of the organization's ten conservation opportunity regions (cors), which are the priority areas established through the organization's strategic conservation plan forever Tennessee. Two of the nine are within five miles of one of the organization's cors. The permanent protection of these properties resulted in the preservation of 2.4 miles of public road frontage as well as 7.3 miles of Tennessee's rivers and streams. At the end of fy25, the organization had protected a total of 136,981.14 acres of land through 457 projects. Stewardship: the organization fulfilled its annual monitoring responsibilities in fy25 through both in-person visits and through satellite imagery. This includes over 350 on-the ground visits completed during the period of april 2024-march 2025. Monitoring is a critical part of the organization's commitment to uphold its promise of protecting land in perpetuity. The organization's stewardship staff also handled hundreds of other stewardship items including activity requests, approvals, easement interpretations, and property transfers. Fundraising: lttn built upon prior years of strong fundraising event successes, enjoying record levels of net income from two key events: our 25th anniversary once in a blue moon event and forever Tennessee. Once in a blue moon hosted nearly 700 guests who gathered to celebrate our governor phil bredesen 25 years after he and a group of thought-leaders founded the land trust for Tennessee. The event raised $280,000 in net income, exceeding the budgeted net income goal by $75,000. Our most recent event, forever Tennessee, held in march 2025, had a net income goal of $80,000, and the final amount raised more than doubled our goal, raising a total of $165,000 in net income for the organization. Outreach and engagement: the organization reached over 1 million people through various social media channels and other virtual outreach methods such as e-newsletters, presentations, and webinars. In addition, the organization engaged in-person audiences by attending and presenting at conferences, tabling events, and hosting programs and volunteer events at glen leven farm. This includes free monthly community days, volunteer opportunities for individuals and companies, and tours for students and groups.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 42
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 96
  • Sustainability: 83
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 35.1%; rating input score 35
  • Program expense ratio: 55.3%; rating input score 55
  • Fundraising efficiency: $10.26 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 53.9%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.48; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 19%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.6% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 35.1% of revenue deployed · 55.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 17 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $186K · 20 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 35/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 55/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 38/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.