The Lady Zaynab Charitable Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
884411471
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Champaign, IL, USA
Phone
4437942749
Rating
65
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$115,600
Expenses
$9,315
Assets
$106,285
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SHAHEEN HAIDER (BOARD PRESIDENT & SECRETARY)
  • DR PARVEZ SHAH (BOARD VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SHAHEEN HAIDER (BOARD PRESIDENT & SECRETARY)
  • HUMAA KAZMI (BOARD TREASURER)
  • DR PARVEZ SHAH (BOARD VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The lady zaynab charitable foundation (the foundation) was created to support and promote supplementary educational and community services within underdeveloped communities, including in sankatra, pakistan. The foundation will receive contributions and will fundraise in order to raise funds to support the mission. The foundation supports existing organizations with the same mission through advising and, at times, monetary support. The foundation operates in the us, but may issue grants to organizations who share a similar mission if the contribution will serve the mission of training future leaders and advocating to advance equity by leveraging supplementary educational programs.

What it reported doing in 2022

To support and promote supplementary educational and community services within underdeveloped communities, including in sankatra, pakistan.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 42
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 85
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 8.1%; rating input score 8
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 91.9%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.41; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 85.5%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 8.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $9K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 8/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.