The Korean United Presb Church
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 362957392
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Chicago, IL, USA
- Phone
- 7732837799
- Rating
- 59
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $792,724
- Expenses
- $811,095
- Assets
- $2,274,381
- Liabilities
- $429,407
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- EUN SUNG CHO (SENIOR PASTO): $30,000 total reported compensation
- EUNKANG JUN (ASSOCIATE PA): $25,000 total reported compensation
- DAEHWAN KIM (EM PASTOR): $24,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Primarily providing religious (christian) services, christian education, training of missionaries, and charity
What it reported doing in 2024
Missonaries & charities
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 69% for direct work, and 31% for member benefits.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 9
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 76.4%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 74.5%; rating input score 75
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 22
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.3%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.8; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.7%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -29.8% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -25.8% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 76.4% of revenue deployed · 74.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 4 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $605K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $30K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 38/100.