The Kathleen Ann Mcclenahan Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
271317346
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
El Granada, CA, USA
Phone
6507267971
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Cancer

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,004
Expenses
$13,505
Assets
$60,347
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MOLLY MILLER (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MOLLY MILLER (PRESIDENT)
  • KEVIN MCCLENAHAN (SECRETARY)
  • BRIAN MCCLENAHAN (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The kathleen ann mcclenahan foundation's mission is to give those who suffer from breast cancer the inner strength to fight their battle successfully each and every day.while many foundations are geared towards finding a cure for breast cancer, the kam foundation is focused on providing comfort and a "yes i can" positive attitude for breast cancer patients in various stages of treatment.whether the need is transportation, visitation, hand holding, someone who cares, or just being there to assist in a way that helps the patient cope with the rigors of treatment, this foundation wants to help out in the fight that kathy so valiantly fought.there will be a cure around the corner, until then, the spirit in the patient is the best cure intil it is found.

What it reported doing in 2025

Food, gift cards, and water bottles are provided to the palo alto medical foundation for distribution to breast cancer patients that need them.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 91.7%; rating input score 92
  • Program expense ratio: 67.9%; rating input score 68

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -35%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.47; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -7.1% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 91.7% of revenue deployed · 67.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $9K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.