The Kareem Jackson Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 464554376
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Florence, KY, USA
- Phone
- 8597463431
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health - General and Rehabilitative N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $56,459
- Expenses
- $57,886
- Assets
- $32,098
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KAREEM JACKSON (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KAREEM JACKSON (PRESIDENT)
- AMBER DEVILLE JACKSON (VICE PRESIDE)
- MATT WILSON (SECRETARY/TR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Providing families with seriously and chronically ill children with daily encouragement and life changing experiences. Honoring and supporting women who are battling and those who have achieved victory over breast cancer.
What it reported doing in 2020
Pretty in pink - this event celebrates women who are currently battling or who have achieved victory over breast cancer, showering them with vip treatment and an opportunity to meet kareem and his mom, who is one of the key inspirations behind his foundation's mission. The women enjoy themed cocktails, a gourmet dinner, and spa services courtesy of the four seasons houston, received vouchers for free mammograms courtesy of the rose, and had prosthesis bra fittings provided by nordstroms.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 37
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 36.7%; rating input score 37
- Program expense ratio: 35.8%; rating input score 36
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.5%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.55; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -23.1% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -19.6% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 36.7% of revenue deployed · 35.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $21K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 36/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.