The Justice Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742676958
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- San Antonio, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2106147157
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Private Grantmaking Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $704,092
- Expenses
- $682,450
- Assets
- $113,944
- Liabilities
- $-57
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ALLAN E PARKER JR (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ALLAN E PARKER JR (PRESIDENT): $145,251 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To mobilize citizens, through financial and service contributions to provide free legal representation in landmark cases to protect and restore justice.
What it reported doing in 2024
Operation outcry is a minsitry of the justice foundation that seeks to end the pain of abortion in america and around the world by mobilizing women and men hurt by abortion who share their true stories of the devastating effects of abortion. Operation outcry and the moral outcry are programs that the justice foundation supports to educate against abortion, litigate against abortion and provide legal assistance with abortion issues. Abortion hurts god heals(ahgh)is a ministry that has been created to educate, enlighten and bring the hope of healing to people through the heartfelt testimonies of those who have chosen abortion, suffering the consequences and accepted god's forgiveness and healing. The center against forced abortion (cafa) provides free legal resources and training for lawyers, police, counselors to help mothers who are being unduly pressured, forced or coerced into an unwanted abortion (program saves between 1,000- 2,000 mothers/babies annually)
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 88% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 67
- Accountability: 59
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 88.9%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 91.7%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 26.9%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.1%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.17; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 21.3%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 88.9% of revenue deployed · 91.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 6 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $626K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $145K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 32 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grants require schedule f did not reconcile in the filed values.