The Jude Zayac Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 471447758
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- Dunmore, PA, USA
- Phone
- 5703515291
- Rating
- 40
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $141,085
- Expenses
- $45,338
- Assets
- $211,680
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- THEODOCIA ZAYAC MARRIED TO GREGORY (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- GREGORY ZAYAC MARRIED TO THEODOCIA (CHAIRMAN, TREASURER & SECR)
- THEODOCIA ZAYAC MARRIED TO GREGORY (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide economic benefit to programs for children in northeastern Pennsylvania and fund sudden infant death syndrome (sids) research.
What it reported doing in 2021
The baby & children's pantry continues a long tradition of caring for the needs of women, children and families. The baby & children's pantry is a free community service available to all families who need baby food, clothing (up to size 12), diapers and other baby items.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 77% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 89
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 67.9%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.67; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -66.7% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2014 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.