The Jhw Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
452472626
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2017
Location
Manakinsabot, VA, USA
Phone
8043635679
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$153,144
Expenses
$59,708
Assets
$361,638
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROSALIND W WATKINS (PRESIDENT)
  • JOHN H WATKINS II (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ROSALIND W WATKINS (PRESIDENT)
  • JOHN H WATKINS II (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • CHARLES SKIDMORE (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To raise awareness about the disease of addiction in the community, help prevent substance abuse and relapses for young adults in recovery and provide resources to existing substance abuse programs and substance abuse prevention programs.

What it reported doing in 2025

The 13th annual oyster roast and the 6th annual golf tournament were both extremely successful fundraising events bringing in record proceeds for the foundation. Net roceeds from these two events have gone directly to support recovery advocacy and research initiatives at Virginia commonwealth university and other colleges and universities across the state. The need to further this growth remains critical especially as we see substance use and overdose statistics continuing to rise across the state. If we had to choose a top foundational goal, it would be the continuance to grow and build collegiate recovery programs in Virginia and our role in providing connecting aid to treatment and recovery support for both friends as well as strangers.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 60
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 89
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 41.5%; rating input score 41
  • Program expense ratio: 91.8%; rating input score 92

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 61%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.06; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 14.1% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 29.4% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 41.5% of revenue deployed · 91.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $55K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2017 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 41/100.