The James Beard Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 132752108
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2126754984
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $22,911,314
- Expenses
- $23,175,369
- Assets
- $11,075,169
- Liabilities
- $7,014,598
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
36 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CLARE REICHENBACH (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- CLARE REICHENBACH (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $510,788 total reported compensation
- KRISTOPHER MOON (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $422,145 total reported compensation
- JODI POSNER (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $270,730 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The james beard foundation believes in a vibrant, equitable, and sustainable independent restaurant industry that stands as a cornerstone of american culture, community, and economy - and drives towards a better food system. The james beard foundation aims to be a destination for excellence across the independent restaurant industry, driving the country towards a better food system.
What it reported doing in 2024
The foundation's programs are committed to establishing a more sustainable food system through education, advocacy, and thought leadership. The foundation advocates for policies that make a more equitable and sustainable food system for all involved in the independent restaurant industry across three pillars: racial and gender equity, sustainability, and industry culture and practices. The james beard foundation supports legislation and programs that help turn restaurant jobs into long and healthy careers, and expand who receives access to leadership, visibility, financial stability, and capital. We mobilize a network of thousands of chefs to support jbf's policy priorities and their own advocacy efforts. From training programs to data-driven reports and a virtual education library, these programs aspire to give chefs and their colleagues a voice and the tools needed to make real and meaningful change to their businesses and in their communities. Program offerings include chef's boot camp for policy and change, which is the foundation of our ongoing industry advocacy programs, industry support, community programs, and sustainability initiatives, including the smart catch program, food waste reduction, and defining sustainability beyond the environmental context, to include social and economic resources, as well as considering equitable access for everyone within the food system. The foundation's climate solutions for restaurant survival campaign is dedicated to tackling the significant impact of climate change on independent restaurants, chefs, and the local economies they support. The foundation is bringing together chefs from across the country to raise awareness, educate federal policy makers, and galvanize action to mitigate the impacts of climate change.women's leadership programs aim to champion gender equality by supporting women throughout the lifecycle of their careers. We are committed to providing the tools, resources, and networks to the community to ensure that there are more women-owned businesses and more women in leadership across the industry. Our programs are focused on the pillars of finance, community and network, education and training, and wellness at work. These programs include the women's entrepreneurial leadership program and the financial literacy workshop for women.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 62% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.6%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 84.4%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.46 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.2%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.48; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.63; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.6% of revenue deployed · 84.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 24 of 24 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 9 filed program accomplishments · $19.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $511K · 36 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $4.5M reported
- Consistency: 38 of 38 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.