The Izaak Walton League of America
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 361930035
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Gaithersburg, MD, USA
- Phone
- 3015480150
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Natural Resources Conservation and Protection
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,965,623
- Expenses
- $3,752,852
- Assets
- $13,389,359
- Liabilities
- $301,427
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SCOTT MEYER (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- SCOTT KOVAROVICS (EXEC. DIR E): $233,716 total reported compensation
- MARY RUBIN (DIR. MEMBER): $138,374 total reported compensation
- JARED MOTT (EXECUTIVE DI): $121,211 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To conserve, restore and promote the sustainable use and enjoyment of our natural resources, including soil, air, woods, water and wildlife.
What it reported doing in 2025
General conservation: the general conservation program advances iwla's conservation policy agenda by providing background information to congress and state legislatures; keeping members informed about federal and state legislative and regulatory issues affecting natural resources and the environment; educating the public about important conservation issues; and assisting members and chapters in implementing local conservation projects. Agriculture: since 1937, iwla has promoted farming methods that sustain people and natural resources. To their credit, american farmers feed the country and much of the world. However, current farm practices, enabled by our farm policy, are polluting our water, eroding our topsoil, and degrading soil health. Investments in conservation over the past half century, paid with tax dollars, have helped, but todays problems affect entire landscapes and they are accelerating. Through national policy advocacy, iwlas goal is to expand agriculture conservation programs and funding to scale up conservation practices across millions of acres of land to improve soil health and the nutritional value of our food, reduce polluted runoff, and combat climate change by sequestering more carbon in soil, wetlands, and grasslands. Missouri river initiative: iwla works with federal and state agencies and private stakeholders in Iowa, Nebraska, and South Dakota to assess the environmental challenges facing the Missouri river ecosystem, restore the river's natural flows, improve fish and wildlife habitat, and provide increased opportunities for outdoor recreation. As part of this ongoing effort, iwla coordinates river cleanups and hosts educational events for students and their families along the river. Convention: iwla's annual convention provides an opportunity for members from around the country to participate in the democratic process that governs iwla and to work together to advance iwla's conservation, outdoor recreation and education mission.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.2%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 83.4%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.3 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.4%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.57; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.1%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.2% of revenue deployed · 83.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $3.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $234K · 18 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $880K reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 25/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.