The International Society of Endocrinolo Gy Inc C/o the Corporation Trust Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521095057
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Lutherville Timonium, MD, USA
- Phone
- 8473581170
- Rating
- 50
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $385,734
- Expenses
- $318,420
- Assets
- $2,462,361
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SYED ABBAS RAZA (PRESIDENT)
- HELENA TEEDE (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- HELEN VAN OERS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- SYED ABBAS RAZA (PRESIDENT)
- ALVIN POWERS (SECRETARY)
- HIROTAKA SHIBATA (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Ise is the global network integrating all areas of endocrinology and metabolism to optimize life-long health for people with endocrine disorders. The organization accomplishes this by facilitating collaboration and integration across endocrine organizations and life-long health for people with endocrine disorders.
What it reported doing in 2024
Ise organizes the international congress of endocrinology every 2 years, in collaboration with a member society rotating around the world. The event showcases the latest in scientific findings related to the field of endocrinology.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 70% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 88% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 25
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 23.3%; rating input score 23
- Program expense ratio: 36.2%; rating input score 36
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Limited
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Limited
- Conducts site visits: Limited
- Requires grant agreements: Limited
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.5%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.73; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -6.7% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.8% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.8% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 23.3% of revenue deployed · 36.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $115K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 17 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $264K reported
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes foreign activity
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 23/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 36/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.