The International Society for Musculoskeletal Imaging in Rheumatology

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
205936423
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Boca Raton, FL, USA
Phone
4152331642
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Arthritis

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$11,682
Assets
$5,749

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHARLES PETERFY (President)
  • ORRIN TROUM (Past President)
  • NORMAN GAYLIS (Past President)

People named in this filing

  • CHARLES PETERFY (President)
  • PHILIP CONAGHAN (Regulatory Affa)
  • MIKKEL OSTERGAARD (Chair Education)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary purpose is to bring together through an educational nonprofit society, rheumatologists, radiologists and other specialists dedicated to the furtherance of the art and science of imaging as applied to musculoskeletal diseases.

What it reported doing in 2019

The organizations supports two meetings per year. These meetings consist of a scientific meeting devoted to presentation of data addressing mri in rheumatological practice and an educational meeting to inform health care professionals on the proper use of extremity mri based on sound scientific principals. The research committee will also act as a forum throughout the year to encourage and support research into the role of mri in improving arthritis care.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 15
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 35.5% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -21.9% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -28% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2010 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.