The International Museum of World War Ii Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
455327601
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2020
Location
Natick, MA, USA
Phone
5086471776
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Museum, Museum Activities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$-330,403
Expenses
$31,122
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KENNETH W RENDELL (PRESIDENT/CLERK)

People named in this filing

  • KENNETH W RENDELL (PRESIDENT/CLERK)
  • SHIRLEY MCNERNEY RENDELL (TREASURER)
  • RICHARD C GODFREY (TRUSTEE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The international museum of world war ii is a sacred mission to preserve the lives and heroic actions of the people who fought on all the battle fronts and home fronts during the war. It is a sacred mission to show the heroism of people who left peaceful lives to defend their countries. It is a sacred mission to save the reality of world war ii.

What it reported doing in 2020

Museum program - to make available for the general public, collections of artifacts and documents from world war ii as well as for research and education. Exhibits are organized and operated for the purpose of" saving the reality" of those who saved the world during world war ii. The educational purpose is fulfilled through the presentation of authentic world war ii artifacts and documents. As further disclosed in schedule o, effective september 1, 2019, the museum's board of directors voted to cease operations. The organization was dissolved effective november 25, 2020.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 14
  • Transparency & Controls: 93
  • Accountability: 80
  • Sustainability: 17
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 17.8%; rating input score 18
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -109.4%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4.2% per year; rating input score 0; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -42.3% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -25.4% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 17.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 14 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 17 people listed
  • Consistency: 14 of 14 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2014 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 18/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.