The International Institute of Buffalo

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
160743052
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2021
Location
Buffalo, NY, USA
Phone
7168831900
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Ethnic, Immigrant Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,514,482
Expenses
$5,289,801
Assets
$4,352,183
Liabilities
$285,683

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JENNIFER RIZZO-CHOI (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • JENNIFER RIZZO-CHOI (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $147,000 total reported compensation
  • JASON SABEL (DIR OF FISCAL OPERATIONS (TO 1/2025)): $114,392 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the international institute of buffalo is to make western New York a better place for, and because of, immigrants and refugees. We welcome, connect, and empower the foreign born, and encourage the region's support for different cultures.

What it reported doing in 2024

Refugee integration - iib's resettlement program assisted 229 arrivals to buffalo in fy25, with our expected total of 460. All arrivals in the refugee resettlement program are provided core resettlement services after arrival. Trained interpreters are used for all meetings and translated documents are provided in the client's own language. Vital services included rental and food assistance, connections to and enrollments in allowable social services, and health screenings. All adult clients are connected to english language learning programs, while all minor arrivals are enrolled in local public schools. All arrivals also receive important community orientation, learning about laws and culture, healthcare systems, employment, education, and community services. The largest group of resettled individuals was from myanmar (burma), with 89 arrivals, or 39% of the total. This was followed by afghanistan with 48 (21%), the democratic republic of the congo with 36 (16%), and syria with 23 (10%). Other arrivals came from venezuela, iraq, sudan, somalia, nicaragua, eritrea, ethiopia, algeria, sri lanka, and pakistan. Iib's employment team assisted almost 90 people with employment assistance in fy25. Iib's match grant team worked with 98 clients in fy25, helping individuals find jobs in buffalo and western New York. Almost 90% of enrolled adults were self-sufficient within 6 months of arrival and able to pay all bills without external assistance. Iib's rssp/bria employment program helped 60 individuals find jobs in fy25, of which 54 achieved self-sufficiency within 6 months of starting work. Iib also created and managed two programs focused on pathways to professional careers - one funded by New York state's office of new americans, and one by the office of refugee resettlement. Combined, these programs helped over 70 people in fy25 begin their journey to professional employment and economic independence. Of these, over 50 people were placed in jobs, with over 30 of them placed in professional jobs similar to those they left behind. Enrolled clients included architects, nurses, dentists, accountants, social service workers, and those in skilled trades. Iib also hosted job fairs with local employers, created and managed a job club for job seekers become more familiar with the american workplace, including working on resumes, job interviews, and opening bank accounts, and a career club for more advanced candidates. Roughly 20 individuals enrolled in career club were also matched with professional mentors in their chosen career field. The preferred communities program worked with individuals who have medical concerns or other needs that could place them at risk in buffalo. This includes people with chronic illness, short term medical needs, and single mothers. Iib's legal program assisted over 70 clients in fy25 in securing employment documents, applying for green cards, and securing citizenship.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 76.1%; rating input score 76
  • Fundraising efficiency: $20.91 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.1%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.82; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.9%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73% of revenue deployed · 76.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $147K · 19 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 54/100.