YAI
Legal name: The International Academy of Hope
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 463901238
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 212.787.8315
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Brain Disorders Research
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $32,644,175
- Expenses
- $30,620,067
- Assets
- $67,093,865
- Liabilities
- $48,122,878
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KEVIN CAREY (BOARD CHAIRMAN/CEO OF YAI (DECEASED))
- GARY MILCHMAN (ACTING CEO OF YAI)
- SHANI CHILL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- KEVIN CAREY (BOARD CHAIRMAN/CEO OF YAI (DECEASED)): $765,420 total reported compensation
- SHANI CHILL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $292,796 total reported compensation
- GARY MILCHMAN (ACTING CEO OF YAI): $284,945 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
IHOPE offers children and young adults (ages 5–21) with significant and multiple disabilities a personalized learning journey through education, therapy, and technology to help them reach their full potential. > My son has benefited from the intensive services he has received at iHOPE. His therapists and academic teacher collaborate and identify how he can continue to progress in every aspect of his life. They provide plenty of love, support, guidance, flexibility, and the latest technology and techniques for my son. When we have a concern, they are ready and willing to find a solution. We would be lost without them. Education iHOPE’s educational program focuses on the development of academic, cognitive, and social skills and is designed to address the specific needs and capabilities of each student. A 12-Month academic calendar ensures continuous teaching and learning with full...
What it reported doing in 2024
Educational services are delivered within a warm, nurturing school evironment by educators, researchers, and trainers with an unparalleled concentration of expertise in brain injury. The school operates on a year-round, full-day basis. Ihope embraces and models the hallmarks of exceptional education services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 61
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.6%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 88%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.58 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.2%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.19; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.72; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.5%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 18.4% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16.7% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 30.9% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 82.6% of revenue deployed · 88% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $27M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $765K · 13 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $1.6M reported
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 27/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.