Interfaith Alliance

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
810587332
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Washington, DC, US
Phone
2024660567
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Interfaith Coalitions
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,734,753
Expenses
$2,517,490
Assets
$2,308,740
Liabilities
$213,493

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • REV PAUL RAUSHENBUSH (PRESIDENT/CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • REV PAUL RAUSHENBUSH (PRESIDENT/CEO): $253,000 total reported compensation
  • REV DR KATHARINE HENDERSON (FORMER OFFICER/CONSULTANT): $165,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Interfaith Alliance is a network of people of diverse faiths and beliefs from across the country working together to build a resilient democracy and fulfill America’s promise of religious freedom and civil rights not just for some, but for all. Our mission is to build a resilient, inclusive democracy that honors the freedoms of belief and religious practice for all, not just a select few. Join us in challenging Christian nationalism and religious extremism, and help us forge powerful alliances across diverse faiths and beliefs to protect our democratic values. Button Text Title. Interfaith Alliance is a critical supporter of the Respect for Marriage Act, which codified protections for same-sex marriage and interracial marriage into federal law. Senator Durbin held up our signed petition demonstrating that the majority of people of faith support same sex marriage. 2023 Partnership...

What it reported doing in 2024

Affiliates and partnerships - believing with justice brandeis that "states are the laboratories of democracy," interfaith alliance invests in partnerships with local affiliates and networks in such states as Iowa, Colorado, Wyoming, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Texas, and Florida. We mobilize and resource coalitions of clergy and civic leaders, advocates, activists, and allies, trusting that local leaders know best the needs of their communities and can reach and influence a broad range of constituencies. To expand the pipeline of leaders with the capacity for interfaith organizing, ia launched a competitive pilot program, the interfaith leadership network (iln). We supported the formation of 10 diverse faith leaders with training, skill building, networks and resources to initiate pro-democracy projects in their local communities. They joined affiliate leaders and partners from across the country for a community and skill building convening in d.c. That kicked off the 30th anniversary celebration. Interfaith alliance led faith for pride, an effort that mobilized 120+ national and local organizations to work against anti-lgbtq+ legislation; 50 faith for pride events were held in 19 states. In partnership with the southern poverty law center, interfaith alliance convened 60 interfaith leaders in montgomery, al for a countering hate summit that highlighted our interfaith approach to confronting antisemitism and islamophobia as well as hate of other kinds, including against lgbtq people and racial and religious minorities. A mapping project resulted in a white paper, countering hate together, that was widely disseminated to our networks. A major effort this year was developing partnerships with civic national partners to bring a "religion strategy" to their work which has been impacted by christian nationalism and its efforts to control public policy. These groups include the american library association, pen america, the southern poverty law center, democracy forward, and the brennan law center. In preparation for the 2024 election, a defining moment in the fight for pluralistic democracy and against the rise of christian nationalism, interfaith alliance developed the "democracy is in the balance," a non-partisan, values-driven election initiative. This program was designed not only as a timely strategy to counter these emerging threats but as the cornerstone of interfaith alliance's mission to achieve democracy together. Recognizing the significance of this election, the initiative sought to educate, mobilize, and respond effectively, emphasizing the values of religious pluralism, civic engagement, and democracy protection.the initiative's strategic goals were ambitious, but each benchmark was surpassed over the course of 2024. With over 100,000 conversations with voters, numerous virtual and in-person election-focused events, the creation of a messaging guide, and substantial contributions to pivotal victories, the program showcased the power of organized, interfaith action.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 63.4%; rating input score 63
  • Program expense ratio: 67.4%; rating input score 67
  • Fundraising efficiency: $13.44 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 7.9%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.92; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 16.6%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.8% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
  • Where the money goes: 63.4% of revenue deployed · 67.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $253K · 14 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $528K reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 47/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.