Institute for Intergovernmental Research
Legal name: The Institute for Intergovernmental Research Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 591860916
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Tallahassee, FL, United States
- Phone
- (850) 385-0600
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Housing Development, Construction, Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $32,990,337
- Expenses
- $33,079,360
- Assets
- $7,132,685
- Liabilities
- $6,309,918
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RICK S GREGORY - BOARD CHAIR (CEO/PRESIDENT UNTIL 03/31/2025)
- DANIEL STUMP - DIRECTOR OF (PROGRAM OPERATIONS; FORMER CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- RICK S GREGORY - BOARD CHAIR (CEO/PRESIDENT UNTIL 03/31/2025): $298,367 total reported compensation
- GINA W HARTSFIELD - BOARD VICE (CHAIR/SENIOR ADVISOR): $275,324 total reported compensation
- ADAM LEHMANN - BOARD CHAIR 41 (2025; CIO UNTIL 3/31/2025): $261,175 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Creating and delivering dynamic solutions for our criminal justice partners.
What it reported doing in 2024
Regional information sharing systems (riss) - $422,146 expenses; $0 revenues; $0 grants - provide support to riss, which is a national program of regionally oriented services designed to enhance the ability of local, state, federal and tribal criminal justice agencies to identify, target and combat crimes of all types spanning multijurisdictional, multistate and sometimes international boundaries; to facilitate rapid exchange and sharing of information among the agencies pertaining to know suspected criminals or criminal activity; and to enhance coordination and communication among agencies that are in pursuit of criminal activities determined to be interjurisdictional in nature. Riss offers services, tools and resources to aid law enforcement and criminal justice entities to identify, disrupt and prevent terrorist and criminal activities, and to promote officer safety. Information sharing programs - $977,639 expenses; $0 revenues: $0 grants - iir provides support for the global justice information sharing effort to facilitate the broad scale exchange of pertinent justice and public safety data, as well as the promotion of standards-based electronic information exchange in a secure and trusted environment. Coordinates with state, local, tribal and federal law enforcement and homeland security agencies, including fusion center, to develop, disseminate and support enterprise-wide information exchange standards and processes that can enable jurisdictions to effectively share critical information in emergency situations, as well as support the day-to-day operations of agencies throughout the nation. National sex offender registries - $992,020 expenses; $0 revenues; $0 grants - provide support, coordination, and technical assistance for the dru sjodin national sex offender public website, the sex offender registration and notification act exchange portal and the tribe and territory sex offender registry system. Office on violence against women - $ 1,231,060 expenses: $0 revenues; $0 grants. - provide support, coordination, technical assistance and training to assist in the development of effective strategies to reduce violence against women and administer justice for and strengthen services to victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking. Other programs - $2,433,328 expenses; $179,500 revenues; $45,596 grants. - provide support and technical assistance to other criminal justice related programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 99% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 82% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 63
- Accountability: 52
- Sustainability: 18
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.5%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 80.3%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 25%; rating input score 25; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.3%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.22; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.88; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.1%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 17 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 80.5% of revenue deployed · 80.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 8 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $26.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $298K · 20 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $449K reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 55 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 37 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 25/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.