The Institute for Civic Leadership Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
134157508
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2020
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
2127247298
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Youth Development – Citizenship

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$4,350
Assets
$161,676
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

People named in this filing

  • MR KIRK SPAHN (CHAIRMAN)
  • LOUISA CHILDS (SECRETARY)
  • DOUGLAS B HEITNER (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To prepare the next generation of civic leaders to become active and engaged citizens, while building a culture of peace in their local and global communities.

What it reported doing in 2020

Through online courses, students will gain a better understanding of what leadership is, identified what type of leaders they are, and howthey relate to others as leaders. They will also explore how theirknowledge and understanding of themselves affects the way they react to situations. Through reading online cases, watching movie clips, andparticipating in a reflection forum, we hope to empower students totake positive action to improve their schools and community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 37.17; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -36.5% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -22.5% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -6.5% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2014 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.