The Initiative for Mathematics Learning by Inquiry Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
814079331
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2016
Location
Austin, TX, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Public, Societal Benefit

Official website

Reported finances

Expenses
$2,900
Assets
$449
Liabilities
$55

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

People named in this filing

  • DAVID BRESSOUD (BOARD MEMBER)
  • ROBERT J DAVERMAN (BOARD MEMBER)
  • EDRAY H GOINS (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Community of teacher-practitioners at the pre-college, undergraduate, and graduate levels engaged in learning by inquiry. - developing collaborative networks of teacher-practitioners, - supporting the creation of teaching materials, resources, & pedagogical practices informed by mathematics education research, - including teachers & students from traditionally underrepresented backgrounds in mathematics in the practice of ibl, - training graduate students & post-doctoral fellows in ibl methods, & - rpoviding workshops & conferences focused on ibl practice & its assessment

What it reported doing in 2022

Co-host a national conference to expand the community of teacher practitioners of inquiry based learning (ibl) in the classroom. Activities include introductory sessions for novice ibl practioners, working groups to explore cutting-edge innovations, discussion of the mathematical association of americas newly released instructional practice guide, and opportunities to experience model ibl classrooms.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -54.8% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -54.1% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $3K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2017 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.