The Icr Global Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 264218418
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2125046065
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- International Relief
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $31,098
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- NEIL WEIDNER (CHAIR)
- ADNAN ZUBERI (TREASURER)
- LARA JUKES (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The icr global foundation was formed as a grant-making organization that will make grants to charitable organizations that 1) study diseases and particularly the disease of cancer and allied diseases; 2) initiate, encourage, support and carry out research into the causes, prevention, diagnosis and methods of treatment of such diseases; 3) assist in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of such diseases; and 4) provide for the education and practical training in subjects relevant to the study of cancer and allied diseases and the alleviation of suffering.
What it reported doing in 2021
Charitable donation to the institute of cancer research, one of the world's top four cancer research institutions. The purpose of the unrestricted donation was to support the institue of cancer research in its mission to save and improve lives through cancer research. The beneficiaries are current and future cancer patients who will benefit from the scientific advances of the institute of cancer research's scientists.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 36
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 95.8%; rating input score 96
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -15.9% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -21.5% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -14.3% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $30K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2011 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.