The Human-animal Bond Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 364509481
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Morgantown, WV, USA
- Phone
- 3045941124
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $264,174
- Expenses
- $128,593
- Assets
- $2,632,693
- Liabilities
- $634,631
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- EVAN MCWREATH (MANAGER): $12,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To conduct research, education, and training in the area of the human-animal bond with the outcome of benefiting the human and animal condition.
What it reported doing in 2024
Ridgeway farm: the human animal bond continued to manage the cheat lake farmers market, where it supported 8-10 local farmers and served as a valuable source of locally grown produce for over 200 community members throughout the spring, summer and fall months. We continued to offer community garden plots with seven groups participating. Most grew for their families but one focused on growing and selling heritage seeds and another sold at the farmers market expanding our reach. We collaborated with the obesity medicine program at wvu hospitals by hosting a weekly healthy eating program over the summer where, as part of their clinical program, alongside physicians and nutritionist, patients learned to prepare healthy meals using locally grown vegetables and had dinners together at the farmhouse. An arts at ridgeway farm festival was hosted in the fall where 30 local artists displayed and sold their work throughout the property. The event was organized by 30 volunteers from the community and wvu and drew over 250 visitors. We have further opened the property to the community by hosting birthday and holiday parties, encouraging families to enjoy nature and the outdoor spaces. We continue to support the activities of the avian conservation center of appalachia on the ridgeway farm property where 1000s of children and their families visit the bird facilities and events annually. A proposal was successfully submitted for the usda 2025 northeast farmer grant. Results aim to provide regional farmers with sustainable, flexible solutions for drought resilience. Improvements continue on the quarry run property which has been opened for use for training to search and rescue dog training programs. Discussions were initiated with wvu hospice regarding the possibility of partnering on the development of an animal assisted hospice house on the property. An alternative site was chosen.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 52
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 77
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 41.7%; rating input score 42
- Program expense ratio: 85.6%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Limited
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 51.3%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 20.47; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.3%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 20.6% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -9.4% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 41.7% of revenue deployed · 85.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $110K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $12K · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.