House of Hope

Legal name: The House of Hope Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237014595
IRS 990 coverage
2019–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Fort Lauderdale, FL, US
Phone
954-524-8989
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Treatment Only

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,862,460
Expenses
$4,345,259
Assets
$6,923,453
Liabilities
$320,362

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SUSAN GLASSCOCK (CEO/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • DONALD FUCIK (PRESIDENT)
  • DANIEL SCHEVIS (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • SUSAN GLASSCOCK (CEO/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $320,542 total reported compensation
  • DONNALIA DELIZAR (COO): $197,528 total reported compensation
  • JENNIFER RICHARDS (CFO): $129,614 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

House of Hope provides the tools to achieve recovery from addiction and address mental health issues, while transforming lives, families and communities. We provide hope for the future and healing to those in need of a second chance.

What it reported doing in 2024

House of hope, inc is a non-profit, department of children and families (dcf) licensed residential level ii and residential level iii facility. House of hope (hoh) has a licensed bed capacity of 92 and stepping stones (ss) has a licensed bed capacity of 42.hoh/ ss hold the maximum three-year accreditation from carf...the rehabilitation accreditation commission for therapeutic communities, integrated, and aod/mh (criminal justice) programs.program description: hoh/ss is organized as an integrated alcohol and other drugs/mental health facility, providing a combination of alcohol, other drugs/addictions and co-occurring disorders.some of the services provided: a.cognitive behavioral therapyb.substance abuse counselingc.family therapyd.medication managemente.vocational assessment/trainingf.addiction and mental illness educationg.self-help/peer support groupsservices are designed and implemented to: a.support the recovery, health, or well-being of the persons and/or families servedb.enhance the quality of life of the persons servedc.reduce symptoms or needs and build resilienced.restore and/or improve functioninge.support the integration of the persons served into the communityservices are provided through a seamless system of care for adult men and women (18+ years old) with needs in one or both areas or identified co-occurring disorders.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 95% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 57
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 83%; rating input score 83
  • Program expense ratio: 90%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: $35.72 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.6%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.59; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14.9%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 83% of revenue deployed · 90% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $3.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $321K · 11 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $354K reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.