The Hospice Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 561823562
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Winstonsalem, NC, USA
- Phone
- 3367683972
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,474,833
- Expenses
- $5,232,133
- Assets
- $34,587,331
- Liabilities
- $25,061,085
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
25 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL LALOR (CARECENTER CEO (EX-OFFICIO))
- BETH FORRESTER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (EX-OFFICIO))
Highest reported compensation
- MICHAEL LALOR (CARECENTER CEO (EX-OFFICIO)): $462,272 total reported compensation
- DAVE SHELTON (ASSISTANT TREASURER): $217,865 total reported compensation
- BETH FORRESTER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (EX-OFFICIO)): $162,451 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the hospice foundation is to support hospice & palliative carecenter through sound investment, strong fundraising efforts, and comprehensive stewardship of donors.
What it reported doing in 2025
The hospice foundation manages the investments of hospice & palliative carecenter and provides financial support to that organization.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 98.3%; rating input score 98
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -111.4%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.61; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.72; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.2%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 19.1% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 98.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 22 of 22 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $462K · 25 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 14 of 14 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.