The Holly Springs Garden Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 640560080
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Holly Springs, MS, USA
- Phone
- 6624106574
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Garden Club, Horticultural Program
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $64,742
- Expenses
- $35,338
- Assets
- $34,911
- Liabilities
- $13,133
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- EMILY EUBANKS (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- EMILY EUBANKS (PRESIDENT)
- REGAN PRITCHARD (VICE PRESIDE)
- KATHRYN MCALEXANDER (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The holly springs garden club, inc. Has been tasked with the charitable purpose to preserve, maintain, and restore montrose, an antebellum home, for the purpose of educating individuals on the history of the antebellum period and the civil war, during and post war era. Montrose, an antebellum home, is leased to the holly springs garden club, inc. By the city of holly springs, ms. This includes the maintenance of the home, other structures on the grounds, and the arboretum. Montrose was designated a Mississippi landmark by the permit committee of the board of trustees of the Mississippi department of archives and history in 1986.
What it reported doing in 2024
The holly springs garden club, inc. Has been tasked with the charitable purpose to preserve, maintain, and restore montrose, an antebellum home, for the purpose of educating individuals on the history of the antebellum period and the civil war, during and post war era.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 63
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 54.6%; rating input score 55
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 45.4%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.99; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.38; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 54.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $35K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.