The HOLA Parent Teacher Organization
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 273428756
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2016
- Location
- Hoboken, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 2014271458
- Rating
- 50
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $49,023
- Expenses
- $60,196
- Assets
- $32,637
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Bob Crespi (President)
- David Celiberti (Vice President)
- Christina Brown (Vice President)
- Ericka Sullivan (Vice President)
- Nicole Appice Davis (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Bob Crespi (President)
- Vanessa Abrisqueta (Secretary)
- Beth Slifirski (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Planning, funding and/or operation of supplemental educational programs and school facilities and grounds, to enrich the curriculum of basic education offered to the students at the Hoboken Dual Language Charter School, a New Jersey non-profit corporation, and the conduct of fund-raising activities for the support of such programs and school facilities and grounds.
What it reported doing in 2016
During the fiscal year reporting period the Hola PTO organized events in support of its exempt programs. These events included among other the Sabor de Hola gathering, the Third Annual Readathon and its Annual Appeal. Through these successful events Hola PTO enhanced student programming, staff and team recognition and the school's wishlist for building, classroom and school equipment and activities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 32
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 34.4%; rating input score 34
- Program expense ratio: 28.1%; rating input score 28
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -22.8%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.54; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -58.4% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -42% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -39.9% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 34.4% of revenue deployed · 28.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $17K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2013 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 34/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 28/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.