The Herald Charities Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 596138383
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Miami, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3053762525
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $367,021
- Expenses
- $522,626
- Assets
- $2,304,453
- Liabilities
- $19,207
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BOB MCFARLIN (PRESIDENT)
- NANCY MEYER (PRESIDENT 12)
People named in this filing
- NANCY ANCRUM - RETIRED 122023 (BOARD MEMBER)
- TANYA CHRISTIE BENNETT (SECRETARY/TR)
- RAYMOND DUENAS (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Herald charities is primarily involved in the accumulation of funds for charitable and benevolent purposes for the aid of the needy or worthy individuals and not for profit organizations.
What it reported doing in 2024
Holiday wishbook program: the organization operates under the holiday wishbook program, whereby readers of the miami herald and el nuevo herald are solicited to donate funds for the benefit of the needy individuals who are profiled in the newspapers. The herald charities, inc. Profiles needy people in the miami herald media company's newspaper during the thanksgiving and christmas holidays. Since its founding more than 100 years ago, the miami herald has championed the needs of the less fortunate in the south Florida community. In 1952, the miami herald lend-a-hand fund was incorporated to formalize these efforts. In december 1982, the miami herald published its first wish book in an effort to spotlight needy individuals in south Florida. The miami herald charities was officially founded in 1995 to offer readers an opportunity to make a difference in a neighbor's life. Since then, the miami herald readers, together with spanish-language readers of el nuevo herald, have contributed several million dollars to assist some of the neediest people in our community. Wishes ranged from food, clothing, and toys for the holidays to more desperately needed items such as medical services, wheelchairs, housing and home repairs, furniture and dental work. In early october more than 600 non-profit social service agencies in south Florida were contacted to nominate clients for the wish book program. Specifically, wish book candidates are clients for whom the agencies have already expended available funding, but whose needs go beyond the agency's resources. The nominees are screened by the wish book team and the miami herald reporters work diligently to profile as many cases as possible every holiday season, running from thanksgiving day through the first week of the new year. Curently plans are underway for another successful season.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 70.3%; rating input score 70
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -42.4%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.41; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.6% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 70.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $367K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.