The Health Trust
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 946050231
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- San Jose, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4085138700
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health - General and Rehabilitative N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $16,515,068
- Expenses
- $9,960,673
- Assets
- $136,803,917
- Liabilities
- $2,636,814
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHELE LEW (CEO (THRU 06/24))
Highest reported compensation
- AMY CHAN CAO THRU 0624 (INTERIM CFO (START 07/24)): $368,794 total reported compensation
- MICHELE LEW (CEO (THRU 06/24)): $283,301 total reported compensation
- ELISA KOFF-GINSBORG (DIRECTOR OF MENTAL HEALTH): $186,797 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission is to build health equity in silicon valley.
What it reported doing in 2024
Grant making: as a funder, the health trust invests in community-based organizations and public agencies advancing health equity and systems-level change.annually, the health trust commits to invest over $2.3 million through its endowment, which provides a direct benefit to residents of santa clara and northern san benito counties. These restricted dollars are awarded through health partnership grants, where the health trust invests in organizations, programs, and projects that seek to address health inequality, prioritizing deeply impacted communities. The health trust focuses on key drivers of health, like (continued on schedule o) food and nutrition, chronic disease prevention and management, housing support, and other approaches to building health equity.the health trust's philanthropic investments are guided by a regional health-equity framework that seeks to align government, philanthropy, and the community around shared priorities. Funding approaches include multi-year health partnership grants, community grants, and rapid response grants that collectively strengthen the capacity of local organizations to drive measurable and lasting impact.during the year ended june 30, 2025, the health trust awarded $3.65 million, partnering with 77 nonprofit and public-sector organizations through grants, convenings, and collaborative initiatives. Grantmaking supported a range of strategies from rapid-response efforts addressing urgent community needs to long-term investments in food-system transformation, housing stability, and policy advocacy that tackles structural inequities.in an effort to deepen its impact, the health trust remains dedicated to collaboratively funding initiatives with like-minded partners. It successfully co-funded four projects, contributing $747,000 from its restricted fund and leveraging an additional $700,000 from other funding sources, resulting in a total investment of $1,447,000 in its community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 65% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 47% for direct work, and 53% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 78
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75.7%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 69.8%; rating input score 70
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.05 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 97.3%; rating input score 97; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 39.7%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 13.73; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.3%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75.7% of revenue deployed · 69.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $369K · 21 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $1.4M reported
- Consistency: 36 of 37 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 32 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 25 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 20/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.