The Harry W & Margaret Moore Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
316040186
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Eaton, OH, USA
Phone
9379629713
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$85,860
Expenses
$108,433
Assets
$1,823,159
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JAMES N DOYLE (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • JILL KORNDYK (TRUSTEE): $139,068 total reported compensation
  • MARY ANNE TURNER (SEC.-TREAS.): $23,788 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Support organization for the dayton foundation to provide financial aid to deserving and enterprising students of high scholastic standing attending public schools to develop capabilities and inclinations toward higher learning. To provide financial aid and assistance in sectarian and non-sectarian hospitals and institutions, for the surgical, medical care and treatment of those indigent children and adults who are without the necessary means to provide by reason of a chronic or incurable disease or other permanent physical disability. To assist, encourage and promote the well-being of mankind and primarily of the inhabitants of the greater dayton, Ohio area in a manner which is consistent with and not contrary to the similar purposes of the dayton foundation.

What it reported doing in 2025

Support organization for the dayton foundation to provide financial aid to deserving and enterprising students of high scholastic standing attending public schhols to develop capabilities and inclinations toward higher learning. To provide financial aid and assistance in sectarian and non-sectarian hospitals and institutions, for the surgical, medical care and treatment of those indigent children and adults who are without the necessary means to provide by reason of a chronic or incurable disease or other permanent physical disability. To assist, encourage and promote the well-being of mankind and primarily of the inhabitants of the greater dayton, Ohio area in a manner which is consistent with and not contrary to the similar purposes of the dayton foundation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 63% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 76
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 47
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 87.3%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 64.2%; rating input score 64; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -26.3%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 16.81; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.6%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 87.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $95K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $139K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 18 of 19 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 17 filing years from 2009 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.