The Guild for Exceptional Children

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
116037766
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Brooklyn, NY, US
Phone
718.833.6633
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Group Homes

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$39,801,501
Expenses
$37,910,857
Assets
$32,152,364
Liabilities
$11,714,382

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

28 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • FRANK SENA (PRESIDENT)
  • MARION CLEAVER (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ROSINA LINDA RUBINO (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JOE RILEY (CEO/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • JOE RILEY (CEO/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $218,471 total reported compensation
  • PATRICIA ROMANO (COO): $206,114 total reported compensation
  • LAURA THOMPSON (PROGRAM DIRECTOR): $178,969 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide supportive services to children, adults, and seniors with intellectual and developmental disabilities, helping them reach their fullest potential while leading fulfilling lives.

What it reported doing in 2024

Day habilitation: gec's six day programs provide daily support, monday through friday, 52 weeks a year to approximately 225 adults living with intellectual and other disabilities annually. We serve people from all over brooklyn (and a few people from queens and staten island). We have recent graduates as well as supporting people living into their 80's in our senior recreational day program, and everyone in between. Within our six models, we provide support to people who require extensive assistance in every aspect of daily living, as well as people who are independent in some areas but need assistance with other areas. People who attend the gec programs benefit from a focus on wellness, skill acquisition, art and ceramics, horticultural therapy, music/theater, computer literacy, community integration, recreational outings to all the gems New York and brooklyn have to offer, and approximatly 15 community worksites which provide meaningful opportunities to learn, to volunteer and to acquire work skills. Every person is challenged to learn and to grow based on his/her individual preferences. Staff efforts are aimed at ensuring each person is offered choices and opportunities to explore new experiences, gain skills and reach greater levels of independence and happiness.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 74% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.8%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 89.7%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: $43.07 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.8%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.85; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.36; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.7%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 85.8% of revenue deployed · 89.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $34M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $218K · 28 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.1M reported
  • Consistency: 38 of 39 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.