The Greater Brandon Chamber of Commerce Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 590932212
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Riverview, FL, USA
- Phone
- 8136891221
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $187,676
- Expenses
- $188,980
- Assets
- $40,138
- Liabilities
- $32,499
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- Benjamin Bard (Chairman)
- Edward Briggs (Chairman)
- Steve Manning (Chairman)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Greater Brandon Chamber of Commerce is made of diverse professionals in every area of business who have joined together through membership to connect, collaborate and build a better community. Through our program offerings, events, councils and committees, members have the opportunity to grow personally, professionally as well as strategically impact the quality of life for all who work, play and call Brandon home.
What it reported doing in 2024
The Greater Brandon of Commerce promotes economic growth and community development by supporting local businesses through networking events, educational programs, and advocacy efforts. During the tax year, the Chamber hosted 45 business development events with over 1,000 attendees, onboarded 73 members, facilitated 14 ribbon-cuttings for new member businesses, and hosted a new series on advocacy providing a platform to promote informed and active participation in our state and local political processes. The Chamber also partnered with local schools and organizations on 3 different occasions to promote workforce readiness, entrepreneurship, and appreciation to educators.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.7%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.21; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.81; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.