The Goulden Touch Inc Nfp

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
274893228
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Howard, PA, USA
Phone
5702959848
Rating
36
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,799
Expenses
$6,500
Assets
$231,188
Liabilities
$212,100

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROBERT GOULD JR (PRESIDENT)
  • ROBERT GOULD SR (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ROBERT GOULD JR (PRESIDENT)
  • ROBERT GOULD SR (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • CRAIG RUSSELL (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Founded by san francisco 49ers kicker, robbie gould, the mission of the goulden touch is to simply help those in need. The idea is to balance the incredible importance of giving to others while also making charitable giving fun. The public charity focuses its areas of giving within four goulden rules: education, health & wellness, medical research and social service.

What it reported doing in 2020

The goulden touch, inc. Nfp hosts the windy city kicker golf classic on an annual basis in lock haven, Pennsylvania. The event has successfully raised over $400,000 to date and benefits clinton county area youth sports programs and other public programs, including the revitalization of parks and public services. This event was postponed in 2020 due to the covid-19 pandemic

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 47
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -35.4%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 35.57; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.92; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -64.2% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -26.4% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.3% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2017 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.