The Good Shepherd Gracenter of San Francisco
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 941156670
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- San Francisco, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4153371938
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $983,779
- Expenses
- $893,751
- Assets
- $5,440,889
- Liabilities
- $28,476
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Tayo Akanni (President)
- Peter Roldan (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Tayo Akanni (President)
- Peter Roldan (Vice President)
- Chris Brown (Int. Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Good Shepherd Gracenter (Gracenter) helps women without resources break free from drug and alcohol addiction. By providing long-term transitional housing with an individualized 12-Step recovery plan, we offer each woman the opportunity to live a healthy and meaningful life. Gracenters approach is both comprehensive and preventative, providing a clean and sober residence, weekly counseling and mentoring meetings, three healthy meals each day, linkages to social and safety net services, higher education and internships, job readiness and employment opportunities, skill-building classes and workshops, and a community of support to help women achieve independent and sober living. Gracenter clients have an excellent recovery rate due our utilization of best practices in the recovery field which include: a) the 12-Step approach, which is practical and therapeutic; b) Restorative Justice practices of accepting responsibility for one's actions, repairing the harm through apology, restitution,
What it reported doing in 2025
Gracenter is solely focused on one ongoing program offered around-the-clock, 365 days each year: helping homeless women seeking long-term recovery break free from drug and alcohol addiction through a comprehensive recovery program that includes up to two years of transitional housing. It is a step-by-step process to successfully transition from addiction and homelessness into long-term recovery with all the skills needed for self-sufficiency. Gracenter works diligently with each woman to take all the important steps in the recovery process and build a solid foundation of health, economic security and stable housingall important factors in sustaining recovery. In addition providing up to two years of transitional housing, Gracenter provides each resident with three healthy meals per day and holistic support services. During their time at Gracenter, each woman creates an individualized recovery plan with the support of a case manager, and receives weekly one-to-one counseling to meet her recovery goals. Her case manager also helps her obtain all necessary documents, like IDs and social security cards, to receive healthcare, qualifying government benefits, and apply for employment. In addition, the case manager builds the self-sufficiency of each woman to set budgeting goals, improve her credit, establish a savings account, enroll in onsite nutrition and exercise classes, further her education, find permanent housing, and give back to the community through volunteerism. In 2025, 19 women participated in the program and 9 of the women graduated.Gracenter diligently measures client outcomes to ensure the program is effective for long-term recovery from addiction. The following six objectives, all of which are key to long-term recovery, are measured when clients enter and exit their residency at Gracenter, as well as through follow-up communications at 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years after leaving Gracenter: 1. At least 80% of Gracenter graduates will remain in recovery (free of drug and alcohol) use long-term.2. At least 80% of graduates will remain in stable housing after leaving Gracenter.3. At least 80% of graduates will continue to have healthcare long-term. 4. At least 90% of Gracenter graduates will have a stable income long-term.5. At least 85% of Gracenter graduates will remain free of arrest, indictment or conviction long-term. 6. At least 20% of Gracenter residents and 25% of graduates will enroll in higher education. Gracenters approach is both comprehensive and preventative, helping each woman with the support she needs to live a healthy, meaningful and self-sufficient life.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 66.3%; rating input score 66
- Program expense ratio: 68.9%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.85 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.2%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.09; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 66.3% of revenue deployed · 68.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $616K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: 12 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 34/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.