The Goldstock Fund Limited
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 161529946
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Alton, NH, USA
- Phone
- 6037763276
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,596
- Expenses
- $49,883
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHANDLER RUDD (PRESIDENT)
- SHEREEN FARBER (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- CHANDLER RUDD (PRESIDENT)
- SHEREEN FARBER (VICE PRESIDENT)
- EDELL SCHAEFER (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the goldstock fund is to provide funds to rescue organizations or individuals to help pay for transportation, boarding, evaluations and medical expenses for golden retrievers and golden-hearted dogs taken into rescue. The goldstock fund also provides educational information and materials to rescue organizations and the public. For the purpose of grant distributions the fund requires every animal welfare organization to pre-qualify before a grant is authorized or distributed. The fund requests pre-qualifying information including mailing and contact information, business structure, tax exempt status, relationship to other breed clubs, as well as certain policy and operational procedures.
What it reported doing in 2019
During 2019, grants were awarded totaling $46,736. The vast majority of the grants were used to help defray extraordinary medical expenses and boarding incurred by the various recipients.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 94% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 93.7%; rating input score 94
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -791.4%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 22.2% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -8% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -15.9% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 93.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $47K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2019
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.